BACK TO THE FRIENDS OF THE OCHILS HOME PAGE

OCHILS UNDER SIEGE

Friends of the Ochils newsletters have been providing information on all the proposals to build wind farms, and a line of giant pylons, in the Ochils, since No. 25, Spring 2004.
LINK TO NEWSLETTER NO 25

 

 


Friends of the Ochils Response (Photographic Appendix) to Scottish & Southern Energy's Proposals
for the Beauly to Denny power line.

For Scottish & Southern Energy's Proposals see:
Details of Scottish & Southern Energy's Proposals

also this link to Stirling Before Pylons web site.

 

Beauly - Denny power line - latest news

a) The power line proposals
b) Friends of the Ochils’ campaign against the proposals
c) The Public Inquiry: 2007
d) The alternatives to the proposals
e) What you can do
f) Contact us


(a) The power line proposals
Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission Ltd (SHETL - allied to Scottish & Southern Energy Ltd), along with Scottish Power Transmission Ltd (SPT), have applied to the Scottish Ministers for permission to upgrade the electricity power line between Beauly, near Inverness, and Denny, near Falkirk.

The new power line would be an extra-high voltage line (400kV), strung on new, giant pylons (between 46 and 50 metres in height). The whole line would stretch for 220 kilometres.

In the Stirling area, the route would go right across Sheriffmuir, at the western end of the Ochils. It would impact negatively on:
· the White Stone (a Scheduled Ancient Monument), near the A9, in the north,
· the site of the Battle of Sheriffmuir (1715),
· the Sheriffmuir Inn,
· the area of the Sheriffmuir road where some 40,000 people per year set off to walk up Dumyat or round the Cocksburn Reservoir,
· Yellowcraig Wood, the wood (some of it designated Ancient Woodland) which clothes the very prominent south-facing scarp slope of the Ochils, and
· Logie Kirk and the two cemeteries, at the foot of the scarp.

This route would be close to the existing, 50-year old, lower voltage (132kV) power line. The old line would be demolished.

The new line would have giant pylons some twice the height, and 7 times the volume, of the existing pylons. It would be double strung with much thicker and more visible wires.

A new access track, some 8km in length, would require to be constructed across Sheriffmuir, to give access to all the many very heavy vehicles and materials involved in the construction works.

An 80 metre-wide swathe would be cut through Yellowcraig Wood, advertising and emphasising the existence of the new giant pylons, as they come down the scarp slope of the Ochils at Logie.

Some of the negative impacts of the SHETL / SPT proposals were set out in Stirling Before Pylons Briefing Notes.

(b) Friends of the Ochils’ campaign against the proposals

Friends of the Ochils have been opposing the proposals to route the high-voltage overhead power line across Sheriffmuir, since the proposals were first made public, in 2004.

We made detailed representations against the proposals during the consultation stages, in 2005.

We went on to participate very fully in the Strategy session and the Stirling session of the Public Inquiry in 2007, in partnership with Stirling Before Pylons.

Our evidence showed not only that there would be major adverse impacts on the Ochils and on other parts of Stirling, but also that there are real, viable alternatives that would avoid all those impacts.

Friends of the Ochils are now working, with Stirling Before Pylons, to ensure that these alternatives are given full and proper consideration. We know that there is widespread concern among the people of Scotland about the proposals, and we are calling on the Scottish Ministers who will decide the issues to recognise the depth and breadth of feelings on the issues. If you would like to make your views known, please write to relevant Ministers - we offer an appropriate letter you can send.

(c ) The Public Inquiry: 2007

SHETL’s proposals for the Beauly-Denny upgrade were subjected to the largest Public Inquiry held in Scotland since devolution, from early February to Christmas, 2007. The proposals were strongly opposed by all the local authorities along the line, the Cairngorms National Park Authority, Scottish Natural Heritage (who were particularly forceful and persuasive in their evidence against the proposals for the Ochils), and a host of third-party objectors.

Friends of the Ochils joined forces with Stirling Before Pylons, and participated fully in the Strategy session held in Perth between February and May, and in the Stirling session, between November and Christmas.

The Reporters to the Inquiry took over a year to finalise their reports (6 volumes) on the evidence given by nearly 200 witnesses, along with their recommendations. These were formally presented, in confidence, to Scottish Ministers on 17th February 2009. Scottish Ministers and their civil servants are now actively considering what to do, and Ministers are expected to reach a final decision on the proposals some time in 2009. Only then will the results of the Public Inquiry be made public.

Friends of the Ochils’ members gave Ochils-related evidence to the Public Inquiry on the following topics:

Nicki Baker: Ochil Hills: landscape, amenity, recreation etc.
Virginia Wills: The Battlefield of Sheriffmuir
Peter Pearson: Approach to route selection in the Stirling area
Stuart Dean:
Robin Kelsall: Landscape, visual impact et al

Further Ochils-related evidence included:
Carol Anderson (SNH): Landscape and visual issues
Mike Thomas: Stirling’s landscape and geomorphology
Geoff Sinclair: Landscape and visual impact assessment
Nick Hanley: Willingness to Pay to avoid non-market impacts
Fiona Watson: A historic landscape at the heart of the nation
Elspeth King: Stirling’s artistic and literary landscape
Peter Pearson: Historic buildings
James Fraser: Tourism and economic impact
John Logan: Blairmains Farm Shop and Coffee Bothy
Stuart Fulton: Logie Kirk
Nicki Baker: Context and process
Keith Brown MSP:
Simon Allan: Undergrounding

Evidence on the Stirling Eastern Villages was given by member Peter Pearson, Tommy Brookes and the late Archie Bone.

Evidence on the damaging effects on health resulting from living near power lines was given by Stirling Before Pylons members Caroline Paterson and Ian Paterson, as well as a number of others, including Dr Richard Simpson MSP.

Web links for Public Inquiry evidence:

Web link A: http://www.beaulydenny.co.uk/DocumentLibrary/LocalSessions/Stirling/FullPrecognitions/ObjectionGroups.aspx Web link B: http://www.beaulydenny.co.uk/DocumentLibrary/LocalSessions/Stirling/FullPrecognitions/IndividualObjectors.aspx Web link C: http://www.beaulydenny.co.uk/DocumentLibrary/LocalSessions/Stirling/FullPrecognitions/NationalBodies.aspx

(d) The alternatives to the proposals

There are real, viable, economically justifiable alternatives to SHETL’s and SPT’s proposals for an overland, all-overhead power line, using giant pylons. The evidence for this built up inexorably during the course of the Public Inquiry in 2007; crucial parts of it came from SHETL’s own expert technical witnesses. Further evidence has been building up over the months since the end of the Inquiry.

SHETL’s evidence made clear that the main reason they were proposing an all-overhead line was on grounds of cost - but their witnesses also made very clear that they consistently ignored or underestimated the large number of negative human and environmental impacts of their proposals.

The principal alternatives - acknowledged as viable by SHETL’s expert witnesses - would be to use subsea cables linking Scotland to England, or to use underground cables in the worst-affected areas, including Stirling. If all the human and environmental costs of the all-overhead option had been put into the equation, the additional money costs of other alternatives would have been seen to be justifiable.

In relation to subsea cables, the Scottish Government is actively pursuing the possibility of constructing a subsea electricity grid around Scotland, including the outer isles, and linking Scotland to England and international markets. If this comes to fruition, it would appear to take away the need for the Beauly-Denny and a number of other subsequent major inland power line upgrades and new lines.

In relation to undergrounding, in the Stirling area, Scottish Natural Heritage proposed to the Public Inquiry that the line should be put underground to avoid the unacceptable visual impacts on the Ochils scarp (most of all). They outlined a potential route for underground cables, to the west of Stirling, where terrain is much more suitable for this than across the Ochils.

SHETL’s expert witnesses worked up SNH’s proposals in more detail, and offered a route that they considered viable. Stirling Council backed SNH’s position.

Putting the line underground through the Stirling area would cost considerably more - but SHETL’s estimates of the additional costs were challenged strongly, as being far higher than is the norm in Europe and north America.

Stirling University’s Professor Nick Hanley showed that the extra costs would be economically justifiable in the Stirling area.

Whatever the solution, all the costs would be borne, over many years, by all electricity consumers in the UK. Since the only reason an overland upgrade may be needed (and this need was strongly disputed at the Inquiry by the Beauly-Denny Landscape Group) is to accommodate the wildly fluctuating amounts of electricity generated by large numbers of wind farms in the north of Scotland, hence meeting UK government targets for renewable energy generation, this is entirely right and proper.

Stirling Before Pylons’ expert witness Simon Allan estimates that putting the route underground would add only around £1 per year to the average household electricity bill.

Web Link A
http://www.beaulydenny.co.uk/DocumentLibrary/LocalSessions/Stirling/FullPrecognitions/ObjectionGroups.aspx

Web Link C
http://www.beaulydenny.co.uk/DocumentLibrary/LocalSessions/Stirling/FullPrecognitions/NationalBodies.aspx

(e) What you can do

The Scottish Ministers (in effect, the SNP members of the Scottish Government) will make a decision, some time in 2009, about whether or not to allow the Beauly-Denny proposals to go ahead. We believe it is crucial that, in doing so, they take account of the very considerable strength of public opinion, against the giant pylons as proposed.

Friends of the Ochils have worked with Stirling Before Pylons to design a special post card. Our aim is to get as many of these as possible signed and sent to relevant politicians. You may come across these post cards in local shops or offered at street stalls.

The post card has also been adapted to a letter which you can print off from this website. Please put your address and name to the letter, sign it, and add any additional comments. Then send it to one or more of the following:

Keith Brown MSP (Ochil constituency)
Bruce Crawford MSP (Stirling constituency)
Jim Mather MSP (Minister for Enterprise, Energy & Tourism)
John Swinney MSP (Cabernet Secretary for Finance & Sustainable Growth)

- all of whom represent the SNP;

Dr Richard Simpson MSP (list member; Labour)
Murdo Fraser MSP (list member; Conservative)
Liz Smith MSP (list member, Conservative).

The address for all of the above MSPs is:

The Scottish Parliament
Edinburgh
EH99 1SP

And if you care about these issues, why not join the Friends of the Ochils?

Link to the letter Link to the Join Us page

(f) Contact us

For more information on the Friends of the Ochils or our campaign against the Beauly-Denny power line proposals, contact: Nicki Baker at nicki@baker-pearson.net



BACK TO THE FRIENDS OF THE OCHILS HOME PAGE